TestComplete

We attempted to use test complete to perform functional and UI tests on our windows native as well as our swift and kotlin apps. In my experience, test complete failed miserably on functional tests incorporating the mobile apps cameras. On the native windows app written in c# test complete has been nothing short of a nightmare. We find ourselves troubleshooting it more than we do our app. You can run the same test twice in a row on a dedicated vm and get the test to pass one time and fail the other with no changes made to the app your testing.

We use TestComplete to automate testing of Microsoft Office AddIns that are based on .NET and WPF. We use a mix of keyword tests and scripting to create testing suites that can run autonomously and report through various checkpoints (region checkpoints for visuals, OCR checkpoints for text recognition, property checkpoints to verify the expected status of UI elements). The interfacing of scripts and keyword tests can be a hassle, but is still very doable and allows for different levels of expertise to work together. Objects can be found, identified (by their properties), and saved in the name mapping that also allows to then address them under an alias for improved usability. Finding objects is possible both by locating them on-screen or if they are in a lower hierarchy (or you'd like to add mappings for non-visual objects) the object browser is a powerful tool to analyze the whole structure of an application. This provides us with key functionality for our test automation.

We use TestComplete as the test automation tool for our suite Windows Forms applications and modules - over 100 different modules in total. It allows users without an existing test automation background to develop automated test suites and execute those on demand. This leads to increased accuracy and repeatability of our tests while reducing the time it takes to run our regression suites.

We are in the Insurance and Travel business. Lots of our web applications are re-developed and re-designed. We decided to evaluate the test automation tools to align with our applications. Most applications are web platforms and Mobile. The whole idea was to use the tools to perform SmokeTest and Functional testing whenever we needed.

We are using TestComplete to automate Delphi-based thick client GUI testing, complementing what is done via unit and integration testing. As we are using advanced components like VirtualTreeView, the ability to write our own plugins was decisive in the decision to move forward with TestComplete when we evaluated automated test environments. Pricing is fair and support has always been there when we needed it which cannot be said of all actors in this market. All in all, we are very pleased with TestComplete.

Used for UI testing of our desktop application. Really helpful to check for regression in the hundreds of small features it has, especially when a Unit Test isn't possible, because a lot of GUI logic is needed before launching the business logic. It is also great to know that each window, tab, and popup was checked before release, especially when the test users mainly focus on the new feature of the software.

TestComplete is used in several projects with different technologies. We have about ten licenses in our French offices

TestComplete is the key UI automation tool in our organization. It allows us to quickly and efficiently write powerful, fast, scalable and reliable automated tests. It is a key driver in allowing us to react to customer needs, and quickly implement change in our products, while giving us the confidence to know our products still meet the levels of quality our users expect.

TestComplete can be used fully to automate all desktop, web, and mobile apps across different teams or organizations. Most of the ROI reduces a lot of scripting and time, in order to solve errors and warnings since TestComplete supports AI driven self-healing mechanisms. It also integrates with all the CI/CD tools/bug tracking tools easily.
It has increased speed by delivery (record/playback, reusability of scripts), automation made simpler(manual testers/anybody can use it with no skillset), and delivery of the quality customers want (AI features helps you correct and detect potential issues).

TestComplete is used within my company in special projects. We use it to automate the regression tests for a product we develop for our customers.

TestComplete is used solely within the Quality department at my organization and is used to test the web application portion of our product. We maintain a bank of test scripts that we developed, and are planning to integrate the execution of the test scripts into our CI/CD pipeline in the near future.

TestComplete is being used across the organization for multiple purposes. The QA Team uses it for their functional and regression testing, and the same is being used to test the integration by the Devs. The BAs and other businesses use it to get the UAT. Before, we put our applications into the production environment.

I started using TestComplete about 7 years ago when I was brought into the company to set up a formal software QA process. I had used a few other automation tools in the past but wanted to try a bunch out on the new software. I ended up going with SmartBear as it worked well with the software I was going to test. With TestComplete's modules, I was able to use web and mobile scripts easily. Our sales tools have complex formulas to get pricing, so TestComplete made it easy to do. I pull rates from the DB, use an Excel spreadsheet to store options/data for each scenario to run, calculate the values, then easily compare to what is shown on the screen to verify. Android app was just as easy to use.

For the second set of automation, I created data entry scripts that allow TestComplete to enter business data into our main system 24/7 with the desktop module. This ensures that there's no human error entering and it saves from having a team input data for days on end. Adding TestExecute to a virtual machine means that I can push my TC code there and have any number of users run the data entry scripts at anytime. By adding code to allow the user to pick their Excel sheet of data and which line to start on, I don't ever need to babysit the execution of the automation or make changes to the code on the fly.

This is saving the company time and money that can be invested back into the departments for other things. I have a single development TestComplete license for myself and have numerous TestExecute licenses for anyone to use. The license manager sits on a physical machine that they have access to pull from.

TestComplete is only used by the IT QA department. I use it to automate testing, which increases the amount of tests that are completed in a short period of time.

We use TestComplete in the Quality Assurance department, especially me, as we have a one-seat license to Test our records Management Software. We use TestComplete to do functional testing of our product. It helps during our release cycle to run smoothly and helps us to minimize the manual workload.

TestComplete is our primary automation tool for regression testing

We use it as a test automation tool for UI regression testing. It provides good test coverage and provides unique solutions to most of our automation challenges (e.g. comparison of images).

TestComplete has been used to automate desktop applications across various departments in our organization. It helps to automate legacy desktop GUI applications which helps us to reduce test cycle time from 3 weeks to 4 days by automating 75% of test cases. Hence overall release cycle time has been reduced.

I am a lead on the Automation Team. TestComplete is used among my organization for various products. We build upon what TestComplete offers us as our core with our code application-specific frameworks and scripts for sanity, smoke, and regression testing. QA are trained against the TestComplete tool, the FWK and coding to learn how to script, execute, debug, and analyze the results. TestComplete helps greatly to catch defects, DEV changes, design flaws, and performance before releasing to our clients. These issues can only be caught if the scripts are coded in a smart fashion and TestComplete helps with the functionality it provides.

We use TestComplete to test our in-house developed software. Our products bolt onto AutoCAD so we use TestComplete to interact not only with our software, but with AutoCAD too.

Using TestComplete has really made a difference on the efficiency of the product test cycle. Previously a manual process involving hundreds of repetitive tasks, now, i simply load the test suite within TestComplete, press 'go' and it does the boring tests for me while i can do the more interesting exploratory testing manually.

TestComplete has even helped us isolate bugs in our software that we didn't even know existed, due to the nature of how it interacts with our software.

In our organization we have a software system that consists of several windows desktop applications. We use TestComplete to create automated tests for those applications so we can perform continuous automated regression testing. In this way we are trying to release more often and increase the quality of our software

The quality assurance department of Omnitracs Roadnet uses TestComplete to automate user interface testing of several of our applications, including a web application and a Windows presentation foundation (WPF) application. We primarily script automated tests to cover general "day in the life" use of our software, which saves time for manual test engineers during the regression testing period and can catch defects before manual testers find them.

We are currently using TestComplete in my product group but are exploring options for using it in another product group as well. It allows us to fill gaps in our other testing environments (script driven typically).

We use TestComplete as our primary automated testing solution for the company's products. As a major element of the flagship product is the interface, we needed a testing solution that could interact cleanly with visual elements, the way an end user would interact with them. TestComplete handled that requirement.

Across departments, the QA team is writing automations using keyword testing and data driven loops for GUI test generation. We will be setting up a strategy for cross browser testing in the near future.